ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
Plasma proteomic signature for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in HCC.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-Invasive Assessment of Microvascular Invasion Risk in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Liquid Biopsy: Translational Insights and Clinical Implications.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- TALDO1 promotes lipid metabolic reprogramming and immunosuppressive microenvironment remodelling in hepatocellular carcinoma.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Spatial transcriptomic-metabolic features of tumor foci and tumor capsule in microvascular invasion with hepatocellular carcinoma: A spatial multi-omics study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence driven exposome and multi omics integration for biomarker discovery in liver cancer: a literature review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Multi-Omics Biomarker Signatures for Precision Diagnosis and Prognosis in Primary Liver Cancer: A Literature Review.BioFactors (Oxford, England)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a major determinant of poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, reliable non-invasive biomarkers for the preoperative evaluation and diagnosis of MVI are urgently needed in clinical practice. Methods: Plasma samples were collected from 160 patients with HCC (80 MVI-positive and 80 MVI-negative) from four medical centers. Plasma proteomic profiling was obtained using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Principal component analysis and differential protein abundance analysis were used to assess the proteomic changes between the two groups of patients. Protein biomarker candidates were further quantitatively validated by ELISA. Results: Proteomic analysis of 50 patients with HCC (25 MVI-positive and 25 MVI-negative) identified three plasma protein biomarkers (TALDO1, PDIA3, and PGK1) that are significantly upregulated in MVI-positive patients (FDR-adjusted Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the plasma proteomic landscape in HCC and presents a promising blood-based tool for preoperative MVI risk stratification. Impact and implications: This study highlights the transformative potential of plasma proteomic profiling in improving the preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). By integrating data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry and machine learning, we identified three plasma protein biomarkers (TALDO1, PDIA3, and PGK1) and developed the Plasma pRotein MVI risk Model (PRIM), which demonstrated robust diagnostic accuracy across multicenter validation cohorts. These findings pave the way for preoperative risk stratification and personalized therapeutic strategies in HCC management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.