ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
The Incidence of Posterior Ocular Astigmatism in a Refractive Surgery Population as Determined by the Direct Reduction of Topography Measured Astigmatism.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: A retrospective study to determine the incidence of posterior ocular astigmatism (POA) after removal of topography guided excimer laser ablation utilizing topography measured astigmatism and axis to remove anterior corneal astigmatism and measure residual astigmatism in 1500 eyes. Methods: WaveLight Contoura was performed with topography measured astigmatism and axis, and all inaccurate outcomes were analyzed for the presence of low topographic astigmatism and significant residual manifest astigmatism. A secondary enhancement procedure was then performed, and measurements taken to measure the presence of topography measured astigmatism and the lack of manifest astigmatism to confirm that POA had been present. Results: Out of the 1500 eyes, 44 were confirmed to have POA, resulting in an incidence of 2.93%. The average amount of manifest astigmatism in these eyes post-primary procedure was 1.13D, and the average topography measured astigmatism was 0.39D. After secondary enhancement with wavefront optimized ablation, the average amount of post-operative astigmatism was 0.01D, and the average amount of topography measured astigmatism was 1.11D. Post-secondary enhancement procedure, average higher-order aberration was reduced 9%. Conclusion: The incidence of 2.93% is lower than prior estimated amounts of posterior ocular astigmatism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.