ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Dimensional stability of pet-g clear aligners with different thickness through cyclic compressive load tests: An
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ageing effects on chemical, physical, mechanical, and morphological properties of clear aligners - a systematic review.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this Material and Methods: Two starting passive aligners of different thicknesses (0.75 mm and 0.88 mm) were subjected to cyclic compressive loading tests using the Instron 3343 testing machine in the laboratory, both with and without saliva. The intermolar and intercanine distances, measured in the occlusal direction, and the intermolar and intercanine Facial Axis (FA) distances, calculated between the most vestibular points of the crowns defined as Facial Axis points, were recorded using the dedicated software 3Shape Orthoviewer. Finally, the aligners were scanned using a laboratory scanner (3Shape TRIOS®) and then compared with the untested aligners of the control group. Results: The 0.75-mm-thick aligners exhibited greater dimensional stability than the 0.88-mm-thick aligners when measuring intercanine distance, both with and without saliva. In contrast, the 0.88-mm-thick aligners demonstrated greater stability than the 0.75-mm-thick aligners when measuring intermolar distance under the same conditions. In the measurement of FA distances, higher values were observed at the molar level when the tests were conducted both with and without saliva, whereas no significant changes were observed in the intercanine distance. Conclusions: The 0.88-mm-thick aligners demonstrated better dimensional stability during tests with and without saliva in the intermolar distance, while the 0.75-mm-thick aligners showed better dimensional stability in the intercanine distance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.