ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2025
Management of External Root Resorption following Replantation After Accidental Tooth Extraction Using Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: A Case Report.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accidental extraction of the wrong tooth can lead to complications such as external root resorption (ERR) after replantation. This case report describes the management of an 11-year-old female patient with ERR in a replanted mandibular first molar (#36) following iatrogenic extraction. Regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) were employed, including chemical disinfection, intracanal calcium hydroxide medication, blood clot induction, and the placement of Biodentine™. Follow-up over 24 months showed resolution of clinical symptoms, arrest of root resorption, healing of periapical lesions, and complete apical closure. Cold pulp testing yielded positive results after 12 months, confirming regenerative response. This case highlights the potential of REPs as a biologically based approach for managing complex endodontic conditions involving root resorption, even in mature permanent teeth. It contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting REPs as a viable option in the treatment of tooth avulsion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.