ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Development and validation of a Comprehensive Hematological Scoring System for predicting overall survival in patients with soft tissue sarcomas: a comparison with NLR and PLR.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Anatomical Localization on Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Immune Checkpoint CD47 in Desmoid Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Dynamic neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts prognosis in patients with soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective study of 231 cases.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare malignancies with high relapse/metastasis risks and limited treatment efficacy. Current biomarkers like neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) lack comprehensive prognostic value due to their reliance on limited hematological parameters. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 206 STS patients (2016-2023) to develop a Composite Hematological Scoring System (CHSS) integrating 19 pretreatment markers. LASSO regression selected key variables (glucose, CRP, LDL-C, HDL-C, albumin, platelets, hemoglobin, lymphocytes), weighted by coefficients. CHSS's prognostic performance was compared to NLR/PLR via Kaplan-Meier, time-dependent ROC, and Cox regression analyses. A nomogram combining CHSS with clinical variables was validated using C-index, calibration, and decision curves. Results: CHSS outperformed NLR/PLR in predicting overall survival (OS) across all timepoints. High CHSS patients had significantly worse OS (HR=6.197, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed CHSS, age, tumor size, and FNCLCC grade as independent predictors. The CHSS-based nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.79, with accurate 3-/5-year OS calibration. Conclusion: CHSS integrates inflammation, metabolism, and nutrition markers to provide superior prognostic stratification for STS patients compared to NLR/PLR. Its integration into a nomogram supports personalized management, though multicenter validation is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.