Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40823034›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

Nutritional psychology and inflammatory bowel disease: a narrative review of gut-brain axis interactions.

Omer Horovitz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dietary Patterns and Food Choices of Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Disease in New Zealand.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Omer HorovitzThe Physiology and Behavior Laboratory, Tel-Hai Academic College, Qiryat Shemona, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper explores the intricate relationship between Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) and psychopathology, with a particular focus on anxiety and depression. This narrative review synthesizes recent findings on how dietary factors and nutritional psychology influence the gut-brain axis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The bidirectional gut-brain axis, chronic inflammation, and psychological stress are all key contributors to the mental health burden in IBD patients. The paper reviews the physiological mechanisms linking IBD and psychiatric symptoms, particularly how inflammation and gut microbiota composition may influence mood disorders. It addresses the variability in psychiatric comorbidities across IBD subtypes (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) and highlights the challenges in standardized diagnosis and treatment. Emerging research on microbiome-based therapies, nutritional interventions, and personalized care approaches offers promising solutions for improving gastrointestinal and mental health outcomes. Integrating multidisciplinary care, involving gastroenterologists, psychiatrists, and dietitians, alongside advances in precision medicine, holds potential for developing more effective, individualized treatment strategies. However, challenges remain regarding variability in patient responses, methodological inconsistencies, and the need for standardized clinical protocols. The paper concludes by calling for further research to clarify these relationships and optimize treatment for IBD patients struggling with both physical and psychological health challenges.

Indexed as

gut-brain axisinflammatory bowel diseasemicrobiotanutritional psychologypsychiatric comorbidities

Identifiers

PMID40823034
PMCPMC12353710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.