ArticleEuropean urology open science2025
Robot-assisted Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donor: The European Experience.
Article in European urology open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning curves and training in robotic organ transplantation: bibliometric mapping with kidney transplantation as the principal clinical model.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted versus open kidney transplantation in patients who previously underwent an open kidney transplant.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Beyond living donation: robot-assisted kidney transplantation using deceased-donor grafts-a scoping review of selection, ischaemia logistics, and allograft outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robot-assisted kidney transplantation in living and deceased donors: a six-year experience.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: In the context of deceased donors (DDs), robotic-assisted kidney transplantation (RAKT) is underutilized due to specific logistical and technical challenges. The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of DD-RAKT performed in centers involved in the European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS)-RAKT working group. Methods: This retrospective analysis is based on a prospectively collected multicenter database including data on DD-RAKT performed at seven referral ERUS-RAKT European centers from July 2015 to April 2024. Intraoperative, perioperative, and midterm functional outcomes after DD-RAKT were assessed. The decision-making strategy regarding the selection of a robotic versus an open surgical approach for kidney transplantation was also reported across the included centers. Key findings and limitations: A total of 67 patients with a median age of 36 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 24-58) underwent DD-RAKT. Most donors were donors after brain death (80.6%), followed by donors after uncontrolled circulatory death (10.4%); there were 26 "expanded criteria" donors (39%). The median cold ischemia time was 14.8 h (IQR: 11.0-19.0). Eight patients (11.9%) had orthotopic DD-RAKT, while 59 patients (88.1%) had heterotopic DD-RAKT. The median operative time and the median rewarming time were 220 min (IQR: 180.0-252.0) and 50 min (IQR: 42-60), respectively. The major postoperative surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) occurred in 11 patients (16%). Eighteen patients (27%) experienced delayed graft function. At a median follow-up of 27.1 mo (IQR: 9.5-59.4), graft survival rate was 92.6% and patient survival rate was 97.0%. The last median estimated glomerular filtration rate was 55.0 ml/min/1.73 m Conclusions and clinical implications: DD-RAKT is feasible and safe at experienced centers, providing a viable way of expanding transplantation access to patients with end-stage kidney disease. Notwithstanding the logistical barriers for DD-RAKT, careful recipient selection and organ matching are key factors to achieve the best perioperative and functional outcomes. Patient summary: Robotic kidney transplantation using grafts from deceased donors is technically feasible and safe in well-selected recipients at experienced referral centers, showing favorable intra- and postoperative outcomes. While robotic kidney transplantation from deceased donors may be challenging to implement in clinical practice due to organizational and logistical barriers (which may vary across hospitals and countries), careful recipient selection is essential to ensure the best perioperative and functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.