ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging2025
CT CONTRAST PHASE IDENTIFICATION BY PREDICTING THE TEMPORAL ANGLE USING CIRCULAR REGRESSION.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contrast enhancement is widely used in computed tomography (CT) scans, where radiocontrast agents circulate through the bloodstream and accumulate in the vasculature, creating visual contrast between blood vessels and surrounding tissues. This work introduces a technique to predict the timing of contrast in a CT scan, a key factor influencing the contrast effect, using circular regression models. Specifically, we represent the contrast timing as unit vectors on a circle and employ 2D convolutional neural networks to predict it based on predefined anchor time points. Unlike previous methods that treat contrast timing as discrete phases, our approach is the first method that views it as a continuous variable, offering a more fine-grained understanding of contrast differences, particularly in relation to patient-specific vascular effects. We train the model on 877 CT scans and test it on 112 scans from different subjects, achieving a classification accuracy of 93.8%, which is similar to state-of-the-art results reported in the literature. We compare our method to other 2D and 3D classification-based approaches, demonstrating that our regression model have overall better performance than the classification models. Additionally, we explore the relationship between contrast timing and the anatomical positions of CT slices, aiming to leverage positional information to improve the prediction accuracy, which is a promising direction that has not been studied.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.