Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822928›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025

Assessing mesh size and diffusion of alginate bioinks: A crucial factor for successful bioprinting functional pancreatic islets.

Carolin Hermanns, Rick H W de Vries, Timo Rademakers, Adam Stell, Denise F A de Bont, Omar Paulino da Silva Filho, Marlon J Jetten, Carlos D Mota, Sami G Mohammed, Vijayaganapathy Vaithilingam and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. 3D Bioprinting Strategies in Autoimmune Disease Models.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carolin HermannsDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Rick H W de VriesDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Timo RademakersMERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Adam StellDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Denise F A de BontDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Omar Paulino da Silva FilhoDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Marlon J JettenDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Carlos D MotaDepartment of Complex Tissue Regeneration (CTR), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Sami G MohammedDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Vijayaganapathy VaithilingamDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Aart A van ApeldoornDepartment of Cell Biology - Inspired Tissue Engineering (cBITE), MERLN Institute for Technology Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has been utilised for the encapsulation of pancreatic islets for potentially treating type 1 diabetes. A crucial factor in selecting a cell compatible bioink, that maintains islet functionality, is the mesh size and diffusion capacity of the bioink. In this study, we present a screening strategy for alginate hydrogel formulations in three-dimensional bioprinting, utilizing the fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) method and measuring the mesh size of the hydrogels. Subsequently, the 1.5 % alginate formulation that had been selected was used to bioprint the INS1E cell line, primary rat islets, or human islets. It was demonstrated that cell viability and functionality were maintained in all cell sources. This was evidenced by the observation that bioprinted pancreatic islets exhibited a response to physiological glucose levels. The present study indicates that both FRAP and hydrogel mesh size measurements are effective tools for predicting the diffusion of hormones through a hydrogel. These measures should therefore be incorporated into future screenings of hydrogel compositions for the 3D bioprinting of islets.

Indexed as

BioprintingFRAPRheologyType 1 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID40822928
PMCPMC12355097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.