ArticleUrology case reports2025
Penile epidermoid inclusion cyst after circumcision: A case report.
Article in Urology case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-circumcision penile epidermal inclusion cyst in an 8-year-old: A rare late complication of neonatal surgery.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- Penile epidermoid cyst following traditional circumcision: a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epidermoid inclusion cysts are benign lesions resulting from implantation and proliferation of epidermal elements within the dermis, often following trauma and surgery. They are rare in penile region, especially in pediatric patients. This report describes a four-year-old boy who experienced a painless swelling of the penile foreskin two years after undergoing traditional circumcision. Clinical examination revealed a mobile mass on the ventral aspect of the foreskin. Surgical excision, as well as circumcision, were performed under general anesthesia, and histopathology confirmed the diagnosis. The patient recovered after surgery, with no recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.