Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822909›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

The status of machine learning in HIV testing in South Africa: a qualitative inquiry with stakeholders in Gauteng province.

Musa Jaiteh, Edith Phalane, Yegnanew A Shiferaw, Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-Mafuya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Musa JaitehSouth African Medical Research Council/University of Johannesburg Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Edith PhalaneSouth African Medical Research Council/University of Johannesburg Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Yegnanew A ShiferawDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Refilwe Nancy Phaswana-MafuyaSouth African Medical Research Council/University of Johannesburg Pan African Centre for Epidemics Research Extramural Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains one of the leading causes of death globally, with South Africa bearing a significant burden. As an effective way of reducing HIV transmission, HIV testing interventions are crucial and require the involvement of key stakeholders, including healthcare professionals and policymakers. New technologies like machine learning are remarkably reshaping the healthcare landscape, especially in HIV testing. However, their implementation from the stakeholders' point of view remains unclear. This study explored the perspectives of key stakeholders in Gauteng Province on the status of machine learning applications in HIV testing in South Africa. Methods: The study used an exploratory qualitative approach to recruit 15 stakeholders working in government and non-government institutions rendering HIV testing services. The study participants were healthcare professionals such as public health experts, lab scientists, medical doctors, nurses, HIV testing services, and retention counselors. Individual-based in-depth interviews were conducted using open-ended questions. Thematic content analysis was used, and results were presented in themes and sub-themes. Results: Three main themes were determined, namely awareness level, existing applications, and perceived potential of machine learning in HIV testing interventions. A total of nine sub-themes were discussed in the study: limited knowledge among frontline workers, research vs. implementation gap, need for education, self-testing support, data analysis tools, counseling aids, youth engagement, system efficiency, and data-driven decisions. The study shows that integration of machine learning would enhance HIV risk prediction, individualized testing through HIV self-testing, and youth engagement. This is crucial for reducing HIV transmission, addressing stigma, and optimizing resource allocation. Despite the potential, machine learning is underutilized in HIV testing services beyond statistical analysis in South Africa. Key gaps identified were a lack of implementation of research findings and a lack of awareness among frontline workers and end-users. Conclusion: Policymakers should design educational programs to improve awareness of existing machine learning initiatives and encourage the implementation of research findings into HIV testing services. A follow-up study should assess the feasibility, structural challenges, and design implementation strategies for the integration of machine learning in HIV testing in South Africa.

Indexed as

Gauteng provinceHIV testingmachine learningqualitative studySouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID40822909
PMCPMC12354530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.