Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822854›Full record

ArticleCommunications physics2025

Network dismantling by physical damage.

Luka Blagojević, Ivan Bonamassa, Márton Pósfai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Luka BlagojevićDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0001-6246-1190
Ivan BonamassaDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6112-8273
Márton PósfaiDepartment of Network and Data Science, Central European University, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0001-4680-3349

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well-understood that the network structure of complex systems affects their robustness; the role played by the shape of spatially embedded networks, however, is less explored. Here, we study the robustness of networks where links are physical objects or physically transfer some quantity, hence the links can be disrupted at any point along their trajectory. To model physical damage, we tile each network with boxes and we sequentially damage these boxes, removing any link from the network that intersects a damaged tile. Using model and empirical networks, we systematically explore how the layout and the structure of networks jointly affect the resulting percolation transition. For example, we analytically and numerically show that randomly damaging a vanishing fraction of tiles is enough to destroy large-scale connectivity in randomly embedded networks. This demonstrates that the presence of long-range links makes networks extremely vulnerable to physical damage. Our work contributes to the emergent theory of physical networks.

Indexed as

Complex networksPhase transitions and critical phenomena

Identifiers

PMID40822854
PMCPMC12356698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.