ArticleBioinformation2025
Microbial adherence and surface roughness of denture base materials: An
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antibacterial Efficacy of Artemisia Extract and White Vinegar as Disinfectants for Acrylic Prostheses Fabricated Using Conventional and CAD/CAM Techniques: An In Vitro Study.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Implant-supported overdentures have become a widely accepted treatment modality for edentulous patients, offering enhanced retention, stability and comfort compared to conventional complete dentures. Hence, a total of 78 standardized specimens were fabricated and divided into three groups (n = 26 each): Group A (heat-cured PMMA), Group B (CAD/CAM milled resin) and Group C (3D-printed resin). Group B exhibited the lowest surface roughness (0.62 ± 0.12 µm) and microbial adherence (0.41 ± 0.09 OD), followed by Group C (1.25 ± 0.18 µm Ra; 0.68 ± 0.12 OD), while Group A showed the highest values (1.82 ± 0.23 µm Ra; 0.91 ± 0.15 OD). All intergroup comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). A strong positive correlation (r = 0.86, p < 0.001) was observed between surface roughness and microbial adherence. It is concluded that CAD/CAM milled resin offers superior surface smoothness and reduced microbial adherence compared to heat-cured PMMA and 3D-printed resins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.