ArticleBioinformation2025
Impact of peak expiratory flow rate in general and regional anesthesia: A comparative study.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of sugammadex versus neostigmine/glycopyrrolate combination on peak expiratory flow rates in adult patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anesthesia can have a significant impact on Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) due to several factors that leads to partial airway blockage and restriction air flow making it harder to exhale forcefully. A sample size of 150 study participants was taken, among which 75 subjects were undergone general anesthesia and 75 subjects undergone regional anesthesia. We categorize the participants into 2 groups, where group 1 receives general anesthesia and group 2 receives regional anesthesia. The subjects were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. PEFR (336.02 ± 52.35) and Respiratory rate (16.07 ± 2.42) were found to be drastically reduced in post-operative when compared to pre-operative which was statistically significant (P<0.05). Therefore, it is observed that PEFR is significantly reduced in patients receiving general anesthesia during post-operative period where there is no much change in regional anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.