Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822805›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Comparative study of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl in abdominal surgery.

Asif Kalas, Meghana P Rao, Anwar Hussain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Asif KalasDepartment of Anaesthesiology, KLE JGMMMC, Hubli, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research, Hubli, Karnataka, India.
Meghana P RaoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
Anwar HussainDepartment of Anaesthesiology, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of equal doses of ropivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl as continuous epidural infusions for postoperative analgesia in abdominal surgeries is of interest. Sixty patients were randomized into two groups receiving either ropivacaine or bupivacaine with fentanyl intra-operatively and postoperatively. Sensory and motor blocks, hemodynamic parameters, and pain scores were monitored for 24 hours after surgery. Both groups showed similar sensory and motor block characteristics and recovery profiles with comparable drug dosages. We conclude that ropivacaine and bupivacaine can be used interchangeably as epidural infusions for effective postoperative analgesia with stable hemodynamic and no major complications.

Indexed as

abdominal surgerybupivacainecontinuous epidural infusionEpidural analgesiahemodynamic stabilitypostoperative pain managementropivacaine

Identifiers

PMID40822805
PMCPMC12357713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.