ArticleBioinformation2025
AI assisted surgical guides for dental implant placement.
Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Applicability of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Implant Planning and Surgical Guide Design in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone: A Registry-Based Cohort Study.Clinical oral implants research · 2026Article
- The Design-Driven Innovation Path of Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Healthcare: Theory, Practice, and Future Prospects.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development of a preoperative accuracy prediction model using machine learning for implant placement in static-guided surgery: retrospective observational study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental implant placement requires high precision and advancements in technology, such as AI-assisted surgical guides. Therefore, it is of interest to compare AI-assisted surgical guides, conventional guides and freehand techniques in dental implant placement. Hence, 75 artificial jaw models were divided into three groups of 25 each. The implants were placed using standardized methods. The AI guides were created using machine learning software (PlanmecaRomexis®, India). Statistical analysis (SPSS v25) used Shapiro-Wilk, Levene's test, ANOVA with Tukey, p<0.05, and ICC for reliability.AI-assisted surgical guides offer superior accuracy, stability and implant success rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.