Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822770›Full record

ArticleBioinformation2025

Digital addiction and its relationship with cognitive function among children - A cross sectional study.

Karthika Devi Mariappan, Sasikala Palayan, Zealous Mary C, Joseph Jeganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karthika Devi MariappanDepartment of Faculty of Nursing, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, India.
Sasikala PalayanDepartment of Faculty of Nursing, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, India.
Zealous Mary CDepartment of Paediatric Nursing, Indira College of Nursing, Thiruvallur, India.
Joseph JeganathanDepartment of Nursing, College of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bahrain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern children exhibit a significantly greater reliance on technology compared to earlier generation. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the digital addiction and its effect on cognitive function among children. A Cross sectional study using convenience sampling technique was used to collect data from 419 children aged 9-17 years from pediatric ward and Out Patient Department (OPD) in a tertiary care hospital. The analysis included 419 participants and examined the relationship between digital addiction, measured by the Digital Addiction scale for children (DASC), and cognitive function measured by the PedsQL Cognitive function scale. The mean DASC score was 61.41 ± 18.51, and the mean PedsQL score was 388.49 ± 138.17. A statistically significant negative correlation was found between DASC and PedsQL scores (r = -0.57, p < 0.001), indicating Digital addiction has negative impact on cognitive function of children. This suggests that as digital addiction increases, cognitive function tends to decrease.

Indexed as

childrencognitive functiondigital addictionDigital mediainternet use

Identifiers

PMID40822770
PMCPMC12357703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.