ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Analyses of crop yield dynamics and the development of a multimodal neural network prediction model with G×E×M interactions.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- LSTM-attention-guided graph neural networks for integrated genotype-Environment modeling in maize yield prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Deployment-oriented evaluation of stage-specific information for rice yield prediction across years, sites and site-year environments in southern China.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated how genotype, environment, and management (G×E×M) interactions influence yield and highlight the importance of accurate, early yield predictions for effective farm management and enhancing food security. We developed a yield prediction model capable of determining field-level outputs based on comprehensive data inputs, including genotype, spatial, temporal, environmental, and management factors. Among tested models-LASSO, Random Forest, XGBoost, single-modal CNN-DNN, and multimodal CNN-DNN-the multimodal CNN-DNN ensembled with XGBoost demonstrated superior performance. Applied to the G2F dataset covering 21 states from 2014 to 2021 across various treatments (i.e., standard, drought, irrigation, disease trials), the model excelled particularly in stable historical yield settings (RMSE 2.36 Mg/ha for standard treatment) with an overall RMSE of 2.45 Mg/ha. Additionally, we introduced an empirical tool for identifying high-yield hybrids suitable for standard and challenging conditions. Exploratory analysis confirmed that crop yields vary greatly by hybrid and location interaction and that late planting generally yields less than standard timing. Customized management strategies based on specific local and hybrid conditions are crucial for optimal yield outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.