Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822703›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025

Improving phase 2/3 trials with an enhanced 2-in-1 adaptive design.

Ahrim Youn, Yue Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ahrim YounSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.
Yue YangSanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent drug development, Phases 2 and 3 are increasingly combined into a seamless Phase 2/3 design to accelerate the drug development process. One of the seamless designs, known as the 2-in-1 adaptive design, allows a Phase 2 trial to expand seamlessly into a Phase 3 study based on an early adaptation decision using surrogate endpoints like ORR (objective response rate) or PFS (progression-free survival). We enhanced this design by incorporating a group sequential approach in the Phase 3 part and adding an interim analysis in the Phase 2 part based on the primary endpoint. This enables re-expansion to Phase 3 and improves the overall probability of success. This enhanced design was applied to an oncology trial to address competitive challenges. In this paper, we prove that the enhanced 2-in-1 design controls the Type I error rate and evaluate its operating characteristics through simulation. Simulation results demonstrate that the correlation between the surrogate endpoint used for early adaptive decisions and the primary endpoint does not impact the overall probability of success. Compared to the original 2-in-1 design, this design increases the probability of success without extending the study duration under the null scenario.

Indexed as

2-In-1 adaptive designEarly adaptation decisionGroup sequential designPowerSeamless Phase2/3 designSurrogate endpointType 1 error

Identifiers

PMID40822703
PMCPMC12356016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.