ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2025
Improving phase 2/3 trials with an enhanced 2-in-1 adaptive design.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent drug development, Phases 2 and 3 are increasingly combined into a seamless Phase 2/3 design to accelerate the drug development process. One of the seamless designs, known as the 2-in-1 adaptive design, allows a Phase 2 trial to expand seamlessly into a Phase 3 study based on an early adaptation decision using surrogate endpoints like ORR (objective response rate) or PFS (progression-free survival). We enhanced this design by incorporating a group sequential approach in the Phase 3 part and adding an interim analysis in the Phase 2 part based on the primary endpoint. This enables re-expansion to Phase 3 and improves the overall probability of success. This enhanced design was applied to an oncology trial to address competitive challenges. In this paper, we prove that the enhanced 2-in-1 design controls the Type I error rate and evaluate its operating characteristics through simulation. Simulation results demonstrate that the correlation between the surrogate endpoint used for early adaptive decisions and the primary endpoint does not impact the overall probability of success. Compared to the original 2-in-1 design, this design increases the probability of success without extending the study duration under the null scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.