Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822659›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Endometrial microbiome in mares with and without clinical endometritis.

Lulu Guo, G Reed Holyoak, Udaya DeSilva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lulu GuoDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
G Reed HolyoakDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Udaya DeSilvaDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic endometritis (CE) is a major contributor to reproductive failure in mares and in many other mammals. Current diagnostic methods lack sensitivity due to the lack of pathognomonic clinical signs or ultrasound findings. Although microbial involvement was suggested, no definitive causative agents have been isolated, and the few studies conducted are compromised by the dependence on culturable aerobic organisms. This study compares the endometrial microbiomes of 13 healthy and 13 CE-diagnosed mares that were carefully matched to their locations and management. Microbial diversity was significantly reduced in CE mares, indicating dysbiosis.

Indexed as

chronic endometritisequinemaremicrobiomereproductive healthuterus

Identifiers

PMID40822659
PMCPMC12355929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.