ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025
Economic burden of Chagas disease in Brazil: a nationwide cost-of-illness study.
Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- One health approach to chagas disease: a systematic review on the integration of human, animal, and environmental health.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- Glycocalyx-Driven Immunomodulation in Trypanosoma cruzi: Structures, Host Responses, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targeting.Parasite immunology · 2026Review
- Economic burden of Chagas disease in Latin American countries: a population-based cost-of-illness analysis from the RAISE study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chagas disease remains a public health issue with substantial financial impact on the healthcare system of Latin American countries. Despite its great economic burden, research quantifying the direct and indirect costs are limited, particularly within Brazil. This study estimates the economic burden of chronic Chagas disease in Brazil, as part of the broader project, 'The Burden of Chagas Disease in the Contemporary World: The RAISE Study'. Methods: A Markov model was used to estimate the economic burden of chronic Chagas disease from a societal perspective considering six mutually exclusive health states: four clinical forms (indeterminate, cardiac, digestive, mixed) and two absorptive states (death and cure). This model was analyzed through microsimulation with a one-year cycle length, considering a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients, each repeated 1000 times to report the average. Data on costs were gathered, converted to 2024 purchasing power parity US dollars, and considered direct medical costs and productivity losses due to absenteeism. Findings: The annual economic burden of chronic Chagas disease in Brazil was estimated at $11.44 billion, constituting 0.23% of the gross domestic product, with a lifetime cost per patient of $45,034. Lifetime direct medical costs represent around 72% of the total lifetime economic burden, while indirect costs, 28%. Annual direct medical costs represent around 11% of the Ministry of Health budget. Interpretation: The significant economic burden highlights the necessity for effective public health policies and resource allocation in Brazil's healthcare system. Given the universal health coverage model, understanding these costs can guide improvements and interventions aimed at reducing Chagas disease's impact. Funding: Funding was provided by Novartis Pharma AG as part of a research collaboration with the World Heart Federation, project number CLCZ696D2010R.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.