ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025
Balancing Environmental Sustainability and Nutrition: Dietary Climate Impact in Relation to Micronutrient Intake and Status in a Swedish Cohort.
Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon Footprint of Childhood Diets-A Secondary Analysis of Population-Based Studies.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Co-benefits and trade-offs between environmental impact and diet quality: insights from observational dietary data in a Swedish population.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Is the Planeterranean Diet the Key Driver Towards Health and Environment Promotion? A Narrative Review.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Greenhouse gas emissions in relation to micronutrient intake and implications of energy intake: a comparative analysis of different modeling approaches.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- Iron insight: exploring dietary patterns and iron deficiency among teenage girls in Sweden.European journal of nutrition · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dietary shift is necessary for improving public health, mitigating climate change, and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Adaption of climate-friendly diets might prevent chronic diseases and reduce mortality; however, consuming diets with a low climate impact have been suggested to increase risk of some micronutrient deficiencies. Objectives: This study aimed to examine whether self-reported dietary intake varying in climate impact is associated with nutritional risks and benefits based on both dietary intakes and blood concentrations of micronutrients. Methods: In the cross-sectional Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort (MDC, Results: The mean estimated dietary GHGE were 5.9 kg of carbon dioxide equivalents per day (females: 5.4, males: 6.6). Participants consuming a more climate-friendly diet had lower proportion of animal-sourced foods, energy intake, and intake of all micronutrients assessed ( Conclusions: Despite a lower intake of micronutrients, more climate-friendly diets did not substantially increase risk of deficiencies. The study highlights the importance of measuring both nutrient intake and status when discussing nutritional consequences of sustainable eating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.