ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
SARS-CoV-2 XBB.1.5 infects wild-type C57BL/6 mice and induces a protective CD4
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- T cell-associated immunity induced by heterologous recombinant BCG and purified protein vaccination confers cross-variant protection against SARS-CoV-2.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Transcriptomic insights into the neuropathogenic and immune response alterations in mouse neurons challenged with west nile and japanese encephalitis viruses.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Characterization of virus neuroinvasion, blood-brain barrier integrity and neuroinflammation following Powassan virus infection in mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Article
- Interferon-alpha/beta receptor deficiency enhances susceptibility to Powassan virus infection in mice.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Multi-antigen MVA-vectored SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, GEO-CM04S1, induces cross-protective immune responses to ancestral and Omicron variants.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mouse models are critical for studying SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and evaluating therapeutic and preventive strategies. Standard C57BL/6 mice are generally resistant to infection with the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain due to inefficient binding of the viral spike protein to the murine angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Although human ACE2 transgenic mice can support robust pulmonary infection, these models often develop fatal encephalitis, a pathology not commonly observed in humans. We and others have previously shown that certain SARS-CoV-2 variants can infect wild-type C57BL/6 mice and cause discernible disease. However, the susceptibility of C57BL/6 mice to recently emerged Omicron subvariants, and the role of T cell-mediated immunity in controlling these infections, remain incompletely understood. Herein, we evaluated the susceptibility of wild-type C57BL/6 mice to infection with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5. We assessed viral burden, innate and adaptive immune responses, and virus-induced lung pathology. Our findings demonstrate that XBB.1.5 efficiently replicates in both the upper and lower respiratory tracts of C57BL/6 mice, inducing significant lung inflammation and pathology. Infection elicited a robust pulmonary CD4
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.