ArticleMethodsX2025
Exploring the definitions of gender bias in healthcare literature: a scoping review protocol.
Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the definitions of gender bias in healthcare literature: a scoping review protocol.MethodsX · 2025Article
- "Don't settle": Rural cervical cancer survivors' navigation of cancer care from an intersectional framework.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite growing recognition of gender bias in healthcare, there is a lack of clarity on how gender bias is defined and understood in the literature. Existing definitions often did not consider modern gender constructs, limiting their applicability to current healthcare practices. In order to address these issues, we aim to perform a scoping review (ScR) to systematically explore what definitions and which characteristics of gender bias are found in the literature. Methods: This protocol follows the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for ScR and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A comprehensive search strategy will be performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and other relevant sources (date of last search: January, 15th 2025). We will include any studies that aim to provide structured definitions or conceptual frameworks to define and/or understand gender bias within healthcare clinical settings. Data will be charted using a standardized form to capture the characteristics of definitions, along with the healthcare population and contexts where gender bias has been described. Definitions will be described assessing their relevance from an analytical perspective and their potential for implementation. The findings will be summarized descriptively, with summary tables and figures to highlight key characteristics of the included studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.