Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822524›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2025

Comparative Analysis of Food Addiction and Obesity: A Critical Review.

Sammra Maqsood, Faiyaz Ahmed, Muhammad Tayyab Arshad, Ali Ikram, Muhammed Adem Abdullahi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sammra MaqsoodNational Institute of Food Science and Technology University of Agriculture Faisalabad Faisalabad Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-9203
Faiyaz AhmedDepartment of Basic Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences Qassim University Buraydah Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Tayyab ArshadFunctional Food and Nutrition Program, Faculty of Agro-Industry Prince of Songkla University Hatyai Songkhla Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5290-7631
Ali IkramUniversity Institute of Food Science and Technology The University of Lahore Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-4249
Muhammed Adem AbdullahiDepartment of Food Science and Postharvest Technology Jimma University College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University Jimma Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compulsive ingestion of tasty foods is a characteristic of food addiction (FA), a debated but increasingly recognized disorder that shares neurological features with drug-use disorders. This review examines the overlapping processes between FA and obesity, with a focus on the opioid and dopamine reward systems. Sweet, fatty, and salty processed foods dominate our brain pathways, making them increasingly less able to feel full and urge us to eat more than we require. While the diagnosis remains controversial, the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) is the most widely used assessment instrument. Potential management options include nutrition-based interventions, such as whole-food diets, and behavioral strategies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and conscious eating. However, stigmatization, labeling, and food industry promotion of addictive products pose ethical concerns. Against the backdrop of ongoing controversy, this article summarizes the highest-quality research available on the neurological basis of FA as well as its measurement challenges and possible therapeutic options. The public health implications of FA and obesity can be lessened by future research to explore personalized treatments, refine diagnostic systems, and inform policy.

Indexed as

food addictionhighly palatable foodsnutritional interventionsobesity

Identifiers

PMID40822524
PMCPMC12355965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.