ReviewFood science & nutrition2025
Comparative Analysis of Food Addiction and Obesity: A Critical Review.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applying Artificial Intelligence to Childhood Obesity: T2DM and MASLD Risk Predictive Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Food addiction as a mediator in the association between depression and body mass index among young adults in South Korea: a cross-sectional study.Journal of Korean biological nursing science · 2026Article
- Examining the association between food addiction, stress, and social competence.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Dietary Phytochemicals in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Management: A Comprehensive Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
- Comparative Analysis of Food Addiction and Obesity: A Critical Review.Food science & nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compulsive ingestion of tasty foods is a characteristic of food addiction (FA), a debated but increasingly recognized disorder that shares neurological features with drug-use disorders. This review examines the overlapping processes between FA and obesity, with a focus on the opioid and dopamine reward systems. Sweet, fatty, and salty processed foods dominate our brain pathways, making them increasingly less able to feel full and urge us to eat more than we require. While the diagnosis remains controversial, the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) is the most widely used assessment instrument. Potential management options include nutrition-based interventions, such as whole-food diets, and behavioral strategies, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and conscious eating. However, stigmatization, labeling, and food industry promotion of addictive products pose ethical concerns. Against the backdrop of ongoing controversy, this article summarizes the highest-quality research available on the neurological basis of FA as well as its measurement challenges and possible therapeutic options. The public health implications of FA and obesity can be lessened by future research to explore personalized treatments, refine diagnostic systems, and inform policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.