ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Comparison of reproducibility and workability of single and adjacent implant placement protocol under dynamic real time navigation systems between operators: A clinical trial.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Dynamic navigation (DN), a computer-assisted technique integrating CBCT data and real-time video, has emerged as a promising approach to place implants in the recent years. This study aims to evaluate the consistency and ease of use of a dynamic navigation system for implant placement by comparing the accuracy in single and adjacent implant placements and workability achieved by three different operators. Methods: This study included Forty-eight patients requiring dental implants, total of sixty implants were randomly assigned to 3 operators of varying experiences, the implants were planned and placed under DN. The accuracy of implant placement were measured in terms of mesio-distal, apico-coronal displacement and angulations using Evalunav application ( Results: There were no significant differences in the accuracy of single implants (P > 0.05). For adjacent implants (T1), the displacement in mesiodistal direction was significantly different (P = 0.003) and also for apico-coronal position of T1-abutment group when compared to controls with a P value of 0.026. Experienced surgeons had the highest error rates as well and longest time (18.27 ± 5.62 versus 15 min). Conclusions: The operating surgeon do not determine the accuracy rather the navigation system comes with a steep learning curve that needs to be acquired prior to practicing the same.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.