ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of Cention N and Tetric N-ceram in class I carious lesion in primary mandibular molars.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on long-term ion release, fluoride recharge, pH modulation, and mechanical aging of ACP-based composite versus contemporary bioactive restorative materials.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tetric N-Ceram, recently introduced as an alternative to bulk-fill flowable and traditional non-flowable composite. Cention N, recently introduced tooth-coloured filling material for bulk placement in retentive preparations. Aim: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the performance of Tetric N Ceram and Cention N as restorative materials in Class 1 carious lesions in primary mandibular molars. Design: A prospective double-blind, split-mouth, parallel-group, randomized study was conducted on 34 patients having bilateral Class I carious lesions on mandibular primary molars. 68 teeth were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 was treated with Cention N and Group 2 with Tetric N Ceram. All restorations were clinically evaluated at Baseline - 24hrs, 3, 6 and 9 months for marginal integrity (MI), secondary caries(SC) and gross fracture(GF) using the US Public Health Service criteria (modified Ryge criteria). For post-operative sensitivity(POS), Wong Bakers faces pain rating scale was used. Results: Intragroup comparison of MI, SC and GF in Group 1 and group 2 showed non-significant difference at all-time intervals. Intergroup comparison showed non-significant difference for MI, SC, GF and POS at all-time intervals. Conclusion: Tetric N Ceram and Cention N in terms of MI, SC, GF and POS provide similar results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.