ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Healthy participant engagement in early clinical trials: results from the European EUFEMED survey.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethical and Linguistic Quality of Participant Information Sheets and Their Association with Recruitment Outcomes : An Empirical Bioethics Study of Clinical Trials.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor of the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Re: van Iersel et al. (2026)-Why do healthy volunteers participate in clinical trials? doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70499.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Factors Associated with Willingness to Participate in Clinical Trials in Poles: A Cross-Sectional Prospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A study on the prevalence and influencing factors of the willingness of healthy subjects to participate in clinical trials.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While numerous healthy volunteers contribute to clinical trials on a yearly basis, the aspect of including these participants in the drug development process, like the patient-centric approaches, are not well known. To gain broader insights in the aspect of healthy participant engagement, preferences, and motivation, we performed a European wide survey. Additionally, a literature search on the topic of healthy participant engagement was performed. Methods: An online questionnaire containing 61 questions on demographics, motivation, informed consent, engagement, transparency, and preferences was created, combining five-point Likert and open text field answers. The questionnaire was translated in several European languages and shared among early phase clinical trial units within Europe. Additionally, a literature search was performed on healthy participant engagement. Results: A total of 4,349 completed questionnaires were eligible for analysis. Countries with adequate number of responses were Belgium, France, Netherlands, Germany, Hungary and United Kingdom. Altruistic motivation was the primary reason for participation. The Informed Consent Form (ICF) paragraphs on risk, schedule of assessments and restriction was better read than the financial aspects, ethics and data protection, with variations between gender, age, experience and country. Only 71.2% of the responders finds an ICF written in correct lay language and 44.6% is willing to assist in ICF review on adequate lay language. In the literature search, no articles described healthy participant engagement. Discussion: The benefit of including patients in the drug development process has been proven in multiple publications and is a movement that is being advocated more frequently. Healthy participant engagement is not known yet, while similar benefits can be suggested. As altruistic reasons are the main motivation for participation, engaging participant in the clinical trials might enhance their motivation. Together with all stakeholders, description of methods for healthy participant engagement should be initiated to increase willingness to contribute to clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.