ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Prognostic value of inflammatory markers and different treatment regimens in neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma (NECC) is a rare and highly aggressive gynecological tumor, with poor prognosis and limited standardized treatment options. Inflammation plays a significant role in tumor progression, and systemic inflammatory markers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) have shown prognostic value in other malignancies. However, their role in NECC remains unclear. Methods: This single-center retrospective study included 25 NECC patients treated at our hospital between 2014 and 2024. Patients were divided into three groups based on treatment regimens: paclitaxel plus cisplatin combined with radiotherapy, etoposide plus cisplatin combined with radiotherapy, and radiotherapy alone. Baseline characteristics, inflammatory markers, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Log-rank tests were used to compare survival differences. Results: The median survival time was significantly longer in the etoposide plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy group (1,000 days) compared to the paclitaxel plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy group (776 days) and the radiotherapy-alone group (347 days, P = 0.037). The radiotherapy-alone group had significantly higher neutrophil counts (median = 5.46 × 10 Conclusion: Combined chemotherapy with etoposide plus cisplatin and radiotherapy significantly improves survival outcomes in NECC patients compared to radiotherapy alone. This regimen may be particularly beneficial for postoperative patients and those with high-risk factors such as lymphovascular space invasion. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized treatment protocols for NECC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.