ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Comparative analysis of furosemide and torsemide efficacy in 24 hours of acute heart failure admission.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intravenous (IV) furosemide and torsemide represent a cornerstone of guideline-directed medical therapy for acute heart failure (AHF). However, the evidence regarding the superiority of each agent remains controversial. Methods: The prospective, open-label, comparative study included 51 adult patients hospitalized due to AHF. Torsemide was administered to 25 patients (49%), and furosemide to 26 patients (51%). The primary endpoint was the change in urinary spot sodium level at 24 h, used to assess diuretic efficacy. Secondary outcomes included lung ultrasound (LUS) B-lines, clinical status evaluation based on the Borg scale, Killip-Kimball classification, and daily urine output. Results: After 24 h of treatment, urinary sodium levels increased by an estimated marginal mean (EMM) of 21.84 mmol/L in the furosemide group and 0.97 mmol/L in the torsemide group (p = 0.173). The number of B-lines over 24 h decreased, with an EMM of 28.31 in the furosemide group, and 30.12 in the torsemide group (p = 0.779). The severity of dyspnea, measured by the Borg scale, decreased over 24 h with an EMM of 3.58 points in the furosemide group, and 3.62 points in the torsemide group (p = 0.891). Pulmonary congestion, measured by the Killip-Kimball classification, minimized with an EMM of 0.42 points in the furosemide group, and 0.47 points in the torsemide group (p = 0.770). Daily urine output after 24 h of treatment reached an EMM of 3,559.67 mL in the furosemide group, and 2,734.89 mL in the torsemide group (p = 0.068). Conclusion: Both furosemide and torsemide demonstrated comparable efficacy in the initial treatment of AHF, as assessed by laboratory, ultrasound, and clinical parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.