Review3 Biotech2025
Advancing oral squamous cell carcinoma research: the evolving role of patient-derived cell lines, xenografts, and organoid models.
Review in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- HPRT1 drives mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming and immunosuppressive microenvironment in oral squamous cell carcinoma.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- Proteolysis‑targeting chimeras in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Current evidence, translational challenges and future directions (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Targeting oral squamous cell carcinoma with venom peptides: mechanisms, selectivity and translational potential.The protein journal · 2026Review
- Advances in oral disease models: a mini-review of developments from 2015 to 2025.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a prevalent and aggressive malignancy associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite advancements in therapeutic strategies over the past decades, patient survival has not improved significantly due to underlying genomic heterogeneity, drug resistance, and late-stage diagnosis. Traditional preclinical models have contributed significantly to OSCC research, but often fail to fully recapitulate the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and patient-specific responses. This review comprehensively outlines the diverse preclinical models used in OSCC research, including two-dimensional (2D) monolayer cultures, three-dimensional (3D) spheroids, organoids, animal models, and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). Each model is discussed in terms of its biological relevance, advantages, limitations, and contributions to translational research. Particular attention is given to the emerging potential of organoid systems and PDXs in personalized medicine and high-throughput drug screening. Furthermore, we underscore the importance of integrative approaches combining genomics, proteomics, and pharmacological data to better recapitulate tumor heterogeneity and predict therapeutic response. This review aims to guide researchers in selecting appropriate preclinical platforms to accelerate therapeutic development and precision oncology in OSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.