Article3 Biotech2025
In silico and in vitro evaluation of mucus-binding proteins from probiotics against
Article in 3 Biotech, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Enabling Clinical Translation of Oral Probiotics Through Formulation Engineering and Scalable Manufacturing.Biotechnology journal · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a predictive model for mucus-binding proteins using machine learning and to experimentally evaluate the anti-cariogenic effects of selected probiotic strains. In silico, a computational method was established utilizing Support Vector Machine (SVM) and AdaBoost algorithms with pseudo amino acid composition (PseAAC) for protein sequence representation. The predictive model achieved high accuracy. Specifically, the SVM model demonstrated 94% accuracy, 96% sensitivity, 91% specificity, and an 88% Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) on a labeled test dataset. In vitro experiments assessed the antimicrobial activity and anti-biofilm formation effects of various probiotic strains against
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.