Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822381›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2025

Thoracic Paravertebral Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Plain Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Zhen Yang, Manman Liu, Chengyu Wang, Yuejiao Song, Junmei Wu, Dan Wu, Minmin Yao, Yan Yang, Changhong Miao, Chao Liang

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zhen Yang *Department of Anesthesiology, Xiamen Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0004-8055-9994
Manman Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Xiamen Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Chengyu Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuejiao SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xiamen Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Junmei WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xiamen Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Dan WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Xiamen Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Minmin YaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yan YangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Changhong MiaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Chao LiangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of a thoracic paravertebral blockade with liposomal bupivacaine for thoracic surgery pain management is not well examined. This study compared the effects of liposomal bupivacaine and plain bupivacaine on a thoracic paravertebral blockade in adult patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Methods: Consenting participants (114) scheduled for VATS were randomly assigned to thoracic paravertebral blockade at T4-5 and T7-8 levels with 20 mL (266 mg) liposomal bupivacaine (LB) or 20 mL (37.5 mg) plain bupivacaine (PB) groups. The primary endpoint was opioid consumption at 48 hours postoperatively. Additional main outcomes included the opioid consumption 24 and 72 hours postoperatively; the pain score at rest and coughing 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively; Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores 24 hours postoperatively, the time to the first analgesia request. Results: Opioid consumption did not differ between the groups at 48 hours postoperatively. The QoR-15 scores 24 hours after surgery were higher in the LB group than in the PB group (mean [SD], 120.2 [7.1] vs 116.5 [7.8]; P = 0.009). The time to the first analgesia request was longer in the LB group than in the PB group (mean [SD], 585.8min [211.7] vs 315.3min [101.7]; P <0.001). The areas under the curve for the NRS score at rest were 21.2 and 35.8 for the LB and PB groups, respectively (P = 0.002). The NRS scores during coughing did not differ between the two groups, nor did the CPSP three months postoperatively. Conclusion: Liposomal bupivacaine offers limited but measurable clinical benefits when used for thoracic paravertebral blockade in patients undergoing VATS. Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Registration number: ChiCTR2400081544, URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=221025.

Indexed as

Anesthetics, LocalBupivacaineNerve BlockPostoperative PainThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansLiposomesMaleMiddle AgedThoracic VertebraeAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineLiposomeschronic postsurgical painliposomal bupivacaineparavertebral blockvideo-assisted thoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40822381
PMCPMC12357562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.