Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822373›Full record

ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2025

Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Interventions: A Focused Review.

Akash H Patel, Mark W Abdelnour, Antonio H Frangieh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akash H PatelUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, California, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2268-1391
Mark W AbdelnourUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, California, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3584-9825
Antonio H FrangiehUniversity of California Irvine, Irvine, California, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6645-6367

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of catheter-based interventions has revolutionized the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), from the first heart catheterization in 1929 to the emergence of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) as a treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). This review explores the evolution and clinical application of DCBs in CAD, with a particular focus on their role in managing ISR, de novo coronary disease, and complex lesions. DCBs deliver antiproliferative drugs such as paclitaxel or sirolimus to the vessel wall and have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional stent-based therapies, reducing the need for permanent metallic implants and associated thrombotic risks. Early research demonstrated the effectiveness of DCBs in ISR, and recent studies have expanded their application to small vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, and long diffuse lesions. Notably, DCBs have shown non-inferiority to drug-eluting stents in certain cases, including high-risk patients and those with complex coronary anatomy. Despite some challenges, such as the potential for coronary dissection and the need for optimal lesion preparation, DCBs have demonstrated strong potential in reducing restenosis and improving long-term outcomes in a variety of patient populations. While further studies are required to refine their use in off-label indications, DCBs may represent a versatile, effective, and safer approach in the management of CAD.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, Balloon, CoronaryCardiac CathetersCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary RestenosisPaclitaxelDrug-Eluting StentsHumansProsthesis DesignRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeCardiovascular AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatiblePaclitaxelcoronary artery diseasedrug-coated balloonin-stent restenosisinterventional cardiologypercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID40822373
PMCPMC12352407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.