ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2025
Drug-Coated Balloons for Coronary Interventions: A Focused Review.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insulin or Dapagliflozin Potentially Improves Microcirculatory Dysfunction or INOCA Related to Culprit Vessels in Diabetic Patients With STEMI After DCB Therapy During Long-Term Follow-Up.Journal of diabetes · 2026Observational
- Antithrombotic Polymers: A Narrative Review on Current and Future Strategies for Their Design, Synthesis, and Application.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Sirolimus Versus Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons for Coronary Revascularization: An Updated Meta-Analysis with GRADE Assessment.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Review
- Drug-Coated Balloons and Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissections.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Smart PH-responsive drug-eluting balloons: a next-generation strategy for in-stent restenosis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of catheter-based interventions has revolutionized the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD), from the first heart catheterization in 1929 to the emergence of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) as a treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR). This review explores the evolution and clinical application of DCBs in CAD, with a particular focus on their role in managing ISR, de novo coronary disease, and complex lesions. DCBs deliver antiproliferative drugs such as paclitaxel or sirolimus to the vessel wall and have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional stent-based therapies, reducing the need for permanent metallic implants and associated thrombotic risks. Early research demonstrated the effectiveness of DCBs in ISR, and recent studies have expanded their application to small vessel disease, bifurcation lesions, and long diffuse lesions. Notably, DCBs have shown non-inferiority to drug-eluting stents in certain cases, including high-risk patients and those with complex coronary anatomy. Despite some challenges, such as the potential for coronary dissection and the need for optimal lesion preparation, DCBs have demonstrated strong potential in reducing restenosis and improving long-term outcomes in a variety of patient populations. While further studies are required to refine their use in off-label indications, DCBs may represent a versatile, effective, and safer approach in the management of CAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.