ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of levofloxacin therapy for household contacts of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Vietnam.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Screening and tuberculosis preventive treatment among household contacts of drug-resistant tuberculosis patients: a scoping review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) threatens global TB control, on account of poor treatment outcomes, high treatment toxicity and costs. Recent trials demonstrated the effectiveness of six-months of levofloxacin (6Lfx) to prevent TB disease among high-risk contacts. However, the cost-effectiveness of this strategy has not previously been evaluated. Methods: The VQUIN study was a double-blinded randomised control trial in Vietnam assessing the effectiveness of 6Lfx in household contacts of multidrug resistant/rifampicin resistant TB (MDR/RR-TB) to prevent progression to TB disease. Incorporating in-trial costs and effectiveness outcomes from the VQUIN trial, we developed a closed cohort, decision-analytic Markov model to assess the cost effectiveness of 6Lfx versus placebo in a cohort exposed to MDR/RR-TB in Vietnam. Findings: Over a 20-year time horizon, the provision of 6Lfx preventative therapy to household contacts of people infected with MDR/RR-TB was found to gain a total of 40.1 QALYs per 1000 population and save US$23,145 per 1000 population, indicating the strategy was cost saving. MDR/RR-TB cases averted over 20 years was 19.9 per 1000 population treated with 6Lfx, and the number of deaths averted was 3.2 per 1000 people treated. Interpretation: 6Lfx therapy is a cost-saving strategy to reduce the incidence of active disease in household contacts of MDR/RR-TB in a resource-limited setting. Funding: National Health and Medical Research Council Project Grant (#1081443). GJF was supported by a NHMRC Leadership Fellowship (Level 1) (#2007920).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.