ArticleInfectious Disease Modelling2025
A Bayesian modelling framework with model comparison for epidemics with super-spreading.
Article in Infectious Disease Modelling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Branching Process: A General Conceptual Framework for Addressing Current Ecological and Evolutionary Questions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transmission dynamics of an epidemic are rarely homogeneous. Super-spreading events and super-spreading individuals are two types of heterogeneous transmissibility. Inference of super-spreading is commonly carried out on secondary case data, the expected distribution of which is known as the offspring distribution. However, this data is seldom available. Here we introduce a multi-model framework fit to incidence time-series, data that is much more readily available. The framework consists of five discrete-time, stochastic, branching-process models of epidemics spread through a susceptible population. The framework includes a baseline model of homogeneous transmission, a unimodal and a bimodal model for super-spreading events, as well as a unimodal and a bimodal model for super-spreading individuals. Bayesian statistics is used to infer model parameters using Markov Chain Monte-Carlo methods. Model comparison is conducted by computing Bayes factors, with importance sampling used to estimate the marginal likelihood of each model. This estimator is selected for its consistency and lower variance compared to alternatives. Application to simulated data from each model identifies the correct model for the majority of simulations and accurately infers the true parameters, such as the basic reproduction number. We also apply our methods to incidence data from the 2003 SARS outbreak and the Covid-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. Model selection consistently identifies the same model and mechanism for a given disease, even when using different time series. Our estimates are consistent with previous studies based on secondary case data. Quantifying the contribution of super-spreading to disease transmission has important implications for infectious disease management and control. Our modelling framework is disease-agnostic and implemented as an R package, with potential to be a valuable tool for public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.