Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822262›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2025

Non-efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in postoperative analgesia of non-instrumented spine surgery: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Guillaume Lonjon, Nicolas Ross, Alexandre Dhenin, Matthieu Vassal, Anne Gourari, Nicolas Bouic, Aurélien Bonnal

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04925882 (Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Release Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04925882 nacompletednot on this map

Erector Spinae Plane Block in Lumbar Release Surgery : Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorClinique Saint Jean, FranceRan2022 to 2022Enrolled100ConditionsHernia Lumbar, Lumbar Canal Stenosis, Spinal Cord CompressionArmsErector spinae plane block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guillaume LonjonOrthosud, Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, 34430 St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas RossOrthosud, Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, 34430 St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier, France.
Alexandre DheninOrthosud, Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, 34430 St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier, France.
Matthieu VassalOrthosud, Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, 34430 St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier, France.
Anne GourariASJ, Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, 34430 St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier, France.
Nicolas BouicASJ, Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, 34430 St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier, France.
Aurélien BonnalASJ, Clinique Saint Jean Sud de France, 34430 St Jean de Vedas, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative pain management is a challenge after lumbar spine surgery. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is one solution and seems to limit opioid consumption after lumbar fusion. This RCT explored the effectiveness of ESP block versus placebo in non-instrumented spine surgery within an ERAS program. Research question: The hypothesis suggested the superiority of ESP block across all endpoints, emphasizing its potential as a safe and effective element. Material and methods: In this prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blinded controlled trial using a 1:1 allocation with an intent-to-treat, patients undergoing non-fusion lumbar surgery for one or two levels were included from January to November 2022. Ultrasound-guided ESP block was performed by an anesthesiologist injecting levobupivacaine or saline solution (placebo). The primary outcome was total morphine consumption at 72 h. Results: We included 100 individuals (50 in each arm). Total morphine consumption at 72 h did not differ between the ESP block and placebo groups, nor did cumulative pain score, intraoperative sufentanil administration, 1-month ODI and pain scores. In the daily analysis, morphine consumption was greater in the placebo group at day 0, and in the ESP block group from day 1 to day 3, without significance. The pain scores throughout the first 72 postoperative hours were <3/10 in both groups. Discussion and conclusion: The groups did not differ in morphine consumption at 72 h postoperatively. Increased morphine dose after the first 24 h in the ESP block group could suggest a rebound effect. In patients undergoing non-instrumented spine surgery, the ESP block does not confer additional analgesic benefits.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaAnesthesiologyDisc herniationErector spinae plane blockLumbar stenosisSpine surgery

Identifiers

PMID40822262
PMCPMC12355981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.