ArticleBrain & spine2025
Assessing the clinical relevance of MRI findings in adult achondroplasia patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Achondroplasia (Ach) is the most common form of dwarfism, and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) becomes the primary problem for adult Ach patients. Research question: This study aims to determine the cutoff values of LSS for surgical decompression. Material methods: MRIs of adult achondroplasts with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis referred to our Medical Centre between 2019 and 2022 were reviewed. The degree of lumbar spinal stenosis was assessed by the Schizas scale and dural sac cross-sectional area (DSCA). Regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between treatment decisions and the degree of stenosis, while receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify cutoff values. A follow-up survey was conducted to validate clinical effectiveness. Results: In total, 68 patients were included (mean age: 46.2 ± 15.4 years; 60 % female). Individuals subjected to decompression had higher Schizas scales (p < 0.001) and smaller DSCA (62.5 ± 34.3 mm Discussion and conclusion: Schizas scales C and D or DSCA smaller than 62 mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.