Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822259›Full record

ReviewBJA open2025

Innovative technologies in regional anaesthesia education: a scoping review.

Samuel Chequer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Samuel ChequerKings College Hospital, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Regional anaesthesia has experienced a global resurgence over recent decades alongside increasing demand for anaesthetists to be competent in its delivery. This was reflected in a recent UK anaesthetic curriculum update, which mandates a wide range of specific regional anaesthesia competencies. Despite this, regional anaesthesia education remains Methods: This review was conducted using established frameworks for scoping reviews, and included searches of three major databases, alongside targeted citation searching. Data were analysed numerically, followed by reflexive thematic analysis. Results: In total, 855 citations were identified. After removal of duplicates and abstract eligibility screening, 106 full-text articles were assessed and 38 met the criteria for inclusion. The majority of studies were published in the last 2 yr and a lack of high-quality evidence, particularly focussing on educational outcomes, was noted. A wide range of applications for innovative technologies in regional anaesthesia education were described including roles in anatomy education, accelerated skill acquisition, simulation-based medical education, and assessment. Conclusions: Innovative technologies were associated with benefits such as provision of reliable learning experiences, reduced supervisory requirements, and enhanced educational outcomes. Future educators should consider their utility and provide structured evaluation. Significant heterogeneity was noted in the literature base and further research is recommended, specifically studying primary educational outcomes.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceassessmentaugmented realityinnovative technologyregional anaesthesiasimulationsupervisionvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40822259
PMCPMC12351347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.