ReviewBJA open2025
Innovative technologies in regional anaesthesia education: a scoping review.
Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the era of artificial intelligence: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026Review
- Data annotation and its evaluation in artificial intelligence-based anatomy recognition for ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia: a clinical perspective.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Anaesthesiology: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2025Article
- Transforming Perioperative Care: Evolving Paradigms of the Expanding Role of Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Regional anaesthesia has experienced a global resurgence over recent decades alongside increasing demand for anaesthetists to be competent in its delivery. This was reflected in a recent UK anaesthetic curriculum update, which mandates a wide range of specific regional anaesthesia competencies. Despite this, regional anaesthesia education remains Methods: This review was conducted using established frameworks for scoping reviews, and included searches of three major databases, alongside targeted citation searching. Data were analysed numerically, followed by reflexive thematic analysis. Results: In total, 855 citations were identified. After removal of duplicates and abstract eligibility screening, 106 full-text articles were assessed and 38 met the criteria for inclusion. The majority of studies were published in the last 2 yr and a lack of high-quality evidence, particularly focussing on educational outcomes, was noted. A wide range of applications for innovative technologies in regional anaesthesia education were described including roles in anatomy education, accelerated skill acquisition, simulation-based medical education, and assessment. Conclusions: Innovative technologies were associated with benefits such as provision of reliable learning experiences, reduced supervisory requirements, and enhanced educational outcomes. Future educators should consider their utility and provide structured evaluation. Significant heterogeneity was noted in the literature base and further research is recommended, specifically studying primary educational outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.