Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822248›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2025

"They look you up and down like you are nothing": A qualitative exploration of sex workers' health needs and interactions with UK healthcare services.

E Molloy, R Tiwana, B C French, C Christie, H Smailes, J Taylor, C Bradbury-Jones, Co-Researcher 1Co-Researcher 2

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

E MolloyDepartment of Applied Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
R TiwanaDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
B C FrenchNorthumbria Law School, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne NE1 8ST, United Kingdom.
C ChristieChanon Consulting, Epsom, Surrey KT19 9TS, United Kingdom.
H SmailesDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
J TaylorDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
C Bradbury-JonesDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
Co-Researcher 1Co-Researcher 2

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sex workers are frequently regarded by health services as a homogenous group whose health needs are related exclusively to the services they provide. Little research has explored sex workers' health needs from their own perspectives. Aim: To understand their healthcare needs from their experiences and perspectives. Design: We undertook a four phase multi-method study to assess the health needs of sex workers in Birmingham, UK. This article reports the findings from qualitative interviews with sex workers (phase three). Settings: This study was conducted in the UK with sex workers living and/or working in Birmingham, UK. Participants: 20 sex workers (10 men, 6 women, 2 trans/non-binary, and 2 not disclosed), were interviewed who were over 18 (21-40yrs): offering paid for sexual services involving in-person interactions. Online only service providers were excluded. Participants were recruited via partner organisations, personal networks, and social media (X). Methods: We undertook semi-structured interviews which explored healthcare needs and access for sex workers. Interviews were audio-recorded. Audio files were transcribed, and clean transcripts imported into NVivo to support data analysis. Transcripts were thematically analysed and mapped deductively against the adapted Andersen Model of Healthcare Service Utilisation. Results: Themes interpreted from interview analysis related to healthcare need, enabling factors, service provision and barriers to access. A further category "In an Ideal World" was interpreted inductively reflecting gaps in current healthcare service provision and access. Themes included: fear of judgement and stigma; social taboos; feeling unheard and dismissed by services (missed opportunities for engagement); judgmental service provision; and availability of tailored services and appropriately trained staff. Conclusions: Many sex workers experiences were underpinned by frequent exposure to psychological and physical trauma and violence, either related to lifetime experiences, experiences as a sex worker, and through contact with healthcare or support services. The intersecting marginalised identities of many sex workers were also a feature of their trauma exposure and interactions with healthcare staff. Recommendations include creation of holistic services; training of non-judgemental staff with insight into the complexities of sex work and the intersections of the multiple marginalisations sex workers face; appropriate training for staff in statutory services, e.g., General Practitioner (GP) primary healthcare practices; trained points of contact who can advocate and educate within their services; availability of peer support; integrated service pathways incorporating 'fast track' referral systems between partner organisations.

Indexed as

Enabling factorsHealthcare accessHealth service provisionQualitative researchSex workerThematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID40822248
PMCPMC12356025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.