ArticleSchizophrenia research. Cognition2025
Theory of mind variability in schizophrenia: A neurodevelopmental perspective through neurological soft signs and premorbid adjustment.
Article in Schizophrenia research. Cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Childhood premorbid adjustment as a marker for 20-year impairments in schizophrenia spectrum disorder: results from the OPUS study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Trial
- Replicable subcortical alterations linked to neurological soft signs in schizophrenia spectrum disorders.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Theory of Mind (ToM) is impaired in individuals with schizophrenia (SZ). Given the neurodevelopmental nature of both social cognition and SZ, variations in ToM abilities likely originate early in life. Thus, indirect markers of altered neurodevelopment, such as neurological soft signs (NSS) and premorbid adjustment (PA), may help explain ToM differences. Methods: The study included 38 patients diagnosed with a schizophrenia-spectrum disorder (SSD), 26 healthy siblings and 47 controls. ToM was assessed using the Hinting Task (HT). NSS were evaluated with the Neurological Evaluation Scale (NES) and PA with the Premorbid Adjustment Scale (PAS), yielding Social and Academic scores. Intelligence Quotient (IQ, WAIS-III) and Family History (FH, Family Interview for Genetic Studies (FIGS)) were also assessed. Results: First, patients presented more deficits in two subscales of the NES (motor coordination and sequencing of complex motor acts) than siblings and controls, with siblings performing intermediate in the sequencing subscale. Patients showed worse social PA than siblings during childhood and late adolescence. Second, patients showed poorer HT performance than siblings and controls, but the neurodevelopmental markers did not modulate such differences. Third, within each group, neurodevelopmental vulnerability markers were not associated with ToM performance. Conclusion: In our sample, while patients showed more evidence of neurodevelopmental deviances than siblings and controls, such differences did not contribute to ToM variability. These results suggest a degree of independence between ToM and NSS/PA and that they could be potentially influenced by distinct neurodevelopmental mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.