Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40822115›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational physics2024

Efficient multifidelity likelihood-free Bayesian inference with adaptive computational resource allocation.

Thomas P Prescott, David J Warne, Ruth E Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas P PrescottAlan Turing Institute, London NW1 2DB, United Kingdom.
David J WarneSchool of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Ruth E BakerMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R000816/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Likelihood-free Bayesian inference algorithms are popular methods for inferring the parameters of complex stochastic models with intractable likelihoods. These algorithms characteristically rely heavily on repeated model simulations. However, whenever the computational cost of simulation is even moderately expensive, the significant burden incurred by likelihood-free algorithms leaves them infeasible for many practical applications. The multifidelity approach has been introduced in the context of approximate Bayesian computation to reduce the simulation burden of likelihood-free inference without loss of accuracy, by using the information provided by simulating computationally cheap, approximate models in place of the model of interest. In this work we demonstrate that multifidelity techniques can be applied in the general likelihood-free Bayesian inference setting. Analytical results on the optimal allocation of computational resources to simulations at different levels of fidelity are derived, and subsequently implemented practically. We provide an adaptive multifidelity likelihood-free inference algorithm that learns the relationships between models at different fidelities and adapts resource allocation accordingly, and demonstrate that this algorithm produces posterior estimates with near-optimal efficiency.

Identifiers

PMID40822115
PMCPMC7618014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.