ArticleMedical journal, Armed Forces India2025
Assessment of internal disaster and emergency preparedness in hospitals using the Hospital Safety Index tool.
Article in Medical journal, Armed Forces India, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While being vital infrastructure in circumstances of crisis, health and treatment facilities' equipment is at risk of destruction, and harm to healthcare structures may prevent medical services from being delivered. Enhancements could promote resilience, and assessing current facilities for internal disaster preparedness is crucial. An evaluation of three hospitals' internal emergency and disaster preparedness is presented in this paper. Methods: Hospital safety and preparedness were assessed using the World Health Organization's (WHO) Second Edition of Hospital Safety Index (HSI) tool. The safety indices were determined by three modules: emergency and disaster management, non-structural, and structural. A safety rating, represented as a probability with a maximum value of one and a minimum value of zero, is determined by adding up the weighted results. Over three days, a multi-disciplinary team performed three hospital assessments through staff interviews and visual inspections. Results: The study hospitals' safety indices were 0.90, 0.60, and 0.73; two were classified as Classification A, meaning they will probably be able to function in emergencies and disasters, and one was classified as Classification B, meaning that short-term intervention measures would be required to ensure the hospital's proper operation in the event of an internal disaster. This study has identified areas that must be prepared for internal disasters to increase resilience. These areas include (a) infrastructure, which has weaker protection, access, and physical security due to relatively old buildings; (b) critical systems, which have emergency response committees established by hospitals and can be improved by hospital staff receiving emergency response training; and (c) non-structural issues, which include the need to improve fuel storage, cupboard safety, shelf contents, and fitting protection. Conclusion: Classification A applies to hospitals 1 and 3, whereas Classification B applies to Hospital 2. The HSI tool is a user-friendly, all-inclusive instrument offered by a reputable organisation that should be frequently used to evaluate the internal preparation of different hospitals for disasters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.