ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Reserve of global constructive work for early diagnosis of myocardial ischemia and risk stratification in chronic coronary syndrome.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), assessing myocardial ischemia is difficult due to its variable severity. Myocardial mechanical parameters are helpful in ischemia detection. This study investigates the use of non-invasive myocardial work (MW) for ischemia detection and risk assessment in CCS patients. Method: The study included 115 patients (70 men, mean age 61 years) with suspected or diagnosed CCS in the derivation cohort and 62 patients in the validation cohort. All patients underwent regadenoson stress echocardiography, with early ischemia indicated by coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) <2.5. The patients were categorized based on CFVR, and logistic regression was used to assess the association between myocardial work (MW) and ischemia. Model performance was evaluated for accuracy, prediction, and practicality. The risk stratification thresholds were set by sensitivity and specificity. Results: Of the 115 patients, 48 (41.74%) had myocardial ischemia. MW was more sensitive in detecting ischemia than global longitudinal strain. Multivariate analysis showed that global constructive work reserve (△GCW) was independently correlated with CFVR, with the highest AUC (0.777). A model including △GCW and hemoglobin identified ischemia with a C-index of 0.844 in the derivation cohort and 0.82 in the validation cohort, allowing calculation of the probability of ischemia in CCS. Risk levels were defined by probabilities of 20% (low) and 70% (high). Conclusion: The incorporation of △GCW and hemoglobin into the prediction model enhances its ability to estimate myocardial ischemia risk. △GCW offered higher sensitivity and incremental diagnostic value in detecting myocardial ischemia in the heterogeneous CCS population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.