ArticlePeerJ2025
On
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hydrothermal vent fields are habitats to a diverse array of benthic organisms, including several nematode species, which represent a significant portion of the biodiversity in these environments. Despite their ecological importance, most research on hydrothermal vents has focused on macro-invertebrates. As a result, vent nematode biodiversity remains largely unexplored, especially in peripheral and inactive structures, underscoring the need for further investigation. A sampling program conducted in 2017 and 2018 along a gradient of venting activity led to the collection of a number of Draconematidae species in various habitats. In this article, we introduce Methods: The samples were collected at the Lucky Strike vent field, on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, using the suction sampler of the Remotely Operated Vehicle Victor6000. Specimens were retrieved from an edifice covered by a black layer of manganese oxy-hydroxides, with no local visible hydrothermal activity, at a depth of 1.639 m. Samples were sieved on a 32 µm mesh onboard, sorted and, for nematodes, identified to species level back in the lab. Fluorescent images were obtained using the ApoTome Fluorescence Microscope Module, and 3D observations were possible through the depth change method. Results: We established Conclusion: This discovery contributes to the knowledge of Draconematidae biodiversity, and highlights the importance to investigate nematode communities at species-level, data that is often missing at vent studies. Additionally, it underscores the significance of preserving inactive hydrothermal habitats, which are threatened by deep-sea mining activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.