ArticlePeerJ2025
Muscle contraction type-specific association of acceleration and deceleration performance with rates of force development.
Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many sports require rapid acceleration and deceleration, particularly when changing direction. These movements require a large impulse, highlighting the importance of rates of force development (RFDs). However, the relationships between acceleration and deceleration performance and concentric and eccentric RFDs have remained uncertain. This study evaluated the correlation between RFDs in different muscle contraction types and acceleration and deceleration performances. Methods: This study included 28 healthy subjects (13 males and 15 females; age: 21 ± 2 years; height: 1.66 ± 0.09 m; body mass: 65 ± 10 kg). Concentric, eccentric, and isometric RFDs were evaluated by having the subjects perform squat jumps, countermovement jumps, and isometric squats, respectively. Acceleration and deceleration performances were measured using a 10-yard (9.14 m) sprint and change of direction deficit (COD Results: A faster 10-yard sprint time was only correlated with greater concentric RFD (r(s) = -0.41, Conclusions: A faster 10-yard sprint time was only correlated with a greater concentric RFD, whereas a smaller COD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.