ArticlePatient preference and adherence2025
Investigating Adherence to Asthma Management with an Electronic Monitoring System.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adherence to prescribed inhaler use is critical for effective asthma management and to prevent exacerbations. However, overall adherence to inhaler use among asthma patients is low and the most frequent measures of adherence are considered not sufficiently reliable. The aim of this study was to investigate adherence rates and their impact on asthma management via an electronic monitoring system. Methods: This was a prospective observational study of adults diagnosed with asthma who were equipped with electronic monitoring sensors whose data were recorded from August 2019 to June 2020. The study participants were also divided into two groups: allergic and nonallergic. The study lasted 90 days, and participants' demographic information, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dosage, lung function and asthma control test scores, blood samples, exhaled nitric oxide concentrations, and inhaler usage records from the electronic monitoring system were collected. Results: In total, 39 asthma patients completed the follow-up period. The study results revealed a significant difference in the adherence rates between the allergy and nonallergy groups at 30 days, with respective adherence rates of 49.9% and 22.8%, and at 90 days, the rates were 37.3% in the allergy group and 19.3% in the nonallergy group. The study results also revealed a significant positive correlation between medication adherence and the allergy group, and adherence was negatively correlated with the ICS dosage. Conclusion: In this study, the average medication adherence rates among asthma patients were low and even lower in the nonallergy group than in the allergy group. Electronic monitoring can provide a clearer understanding of patients' medication patterns and could serve as a valuable tool for improving asthma management in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.