ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Serum profiling of the antibody response to HPV in women with or without abnormal cervical cytology undergoing cervical cancer screening.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Versus Vaccine-Induced Immunity Against HPV: A Comparative Review of Antibody Response and Cancer Prevention.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Initial different human papillomavirus infection statuses and subsequent infection risk: a decade-long longitudinal study.Journal of health, population, and nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding the humoral immune response to HPV is important for understanding the natural history of infection and developing biomarkers for early detection of cervical cancer. This has been technically limited by HPV type diversity and challenges of high-throughput protein expression and display. This study aimed to profile the humoral immune response to the proteomes of 12 HPV types in women with or without abnormal cervical cytology undergoing cervical cancer screening. Methods: To detect serum antibodies (Abs) against HPV, we developed custom HPV high-density diffusion-free nucleic acid programmable protein arrays (HD-NAPPA) displaying the proteomes of 2 low-risk (HPV6 and 11) and 10 high-risk (HR) HPV types (HPV16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52 and 58). Arrays were probed with sera from women undergoing screening for cervical cancer, with normal (n=82) or abnormal (n=54) cervical cytology. HPV DNA testing and typing were done on cytology samples from all participants using an assay that detects 37 HPV types. Results: Abs to any HPV protein were detected in 47.6% (95% C.I.: 36.5-58.8%) and 40.7% (95% C.I.: 27.9-54.9%) of women with normal and abnormal cytology, respectively and in 44.9% (95% C.I.: 36.4-53.6%) of all women. HPV16 DNA was the most frequently detected type (36.8%, 95% C.I.: 27.4-47.4%), however, Abs against HPV16 were remarkably the least frequently detected (7.4%, 95% C.I.: 3.8-13.5%). The most frequently detected Abs were against L1, in 30.1% (95% C.I.: 22.7-38.7%) of all women (31.7% and 27.8% of women with normal and abnormal Pap, respectively). Abs against E1 and E4 were the most (in 24.3%, 95% C.I.: 17.5-32.5%) and least (13.2%, 95% C.I.: 8.2-20.4%) frequently detected E-Abs in all women, respectively. Among all subjects with antibodies to either L1 or L2, 39.0% (95% C.I.: 24.6-55.5%) of those with L1 antibodies and 51.9% (95% C.I.: 32.4-70.8%) of those with L2 antibodies were positive for the antigen from only one HPV type. Conclusion: Our findings shed light on the kinetics of HPV-specific humoral immunity in women with normal or abnormal cervical cytology and highlight the need for comprehensive immune profiling in different health and disease stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.