ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Analysis of epidemiology and nomogram construction for prediction and clinical decision-making in gliomas.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A cuproptosis-related lncRNAs-based risk signature for predicting prognosis and immune status in glioma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Natural and Synthetic Compounds, Swords for Glioblastoma Therapy: From Tumor to Its Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gliomas are the most common primary malignant brain tumors with high mortality. Exploring the epidemiologic characteristics and prognostic factors of gliomas, and constructs a nomogram-based predictive model can help to evaluate the public health impact, optimize risk stratification, and guide treatment decision-making. Methods: This cross-sectional epidemiological analysis used the most recently released data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019. The SEER-18 database provided data for incidence, prevalence, survival, and initial treatment, as well as the establishment and validation of a nomogram to predict the survival probability of individual patients with gliomas. Results: Among 71,040 cases of glioma patients, the majority were male (40,500 [57.01%]) and White race (52,443 [73.82%]), with glioblastoma (41,125 [57.89%]) as the predominant histology type, primarily located at the cerebrum (49,307 [69.41%]), and mostly categorized as high-grade tumors (22,447 [31.60%]). The age-adjusted incidence rate of gliomas decreased from 4.42 per 100,000 persons in 2000 to 3.81 per 100,000 persons in 2019 [APC of -0.53 (95%CI, -0.71 to -0.34)]. In the incidence analysis among different tumor histology, grade and primary site, glioblastoma, high-grade tumor and primary site of cerebrum were with the highest incidence, respectively. Additionally, the incidence of different histology varied significantly among different age groups. In the multivariable analysis, age, histology, grade, site and treatment (chemotherapy, radiation and surgery) were identified as prognostic factors. Among these factors, age and grade had the most significant impact on prognosis. Furthermore, a predictive nomogram model for 1-/3-/5-year survival rates of gliomas was developed, incorporating the prognostic factors. For the training and test cohorts, the concordance indexes of the nomogram were 0.796 (95%CI, 0.792-0.805) and 0.799 (95%CI, 0.793-0.808), respectively. Conclusion: The incidence and survival of gliomas showed significant variations across different age, histology, grade, site, and treatment groups. The nomogram model based on these factors could accurately predict the survival among patients with gliomas and aid in optimizing treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.