Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40821804›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025

Exploring immune-inflammation markers in psoriasis prediction using advanced machine learning algorithms.

Li Yang, Shixin He, Li Tang, Xiao Qin, Yan Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Li YangDepartment of Medical Cosmetology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shixin HeDepartment of Medical Cosmetology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Li TangDepartment of Medical Cosmetology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiao QinDepartment of Medical Cosmetology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yan ZhengDepartment of Medical Cosmetology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disorder characterized by multifactorial pathogenesis. Recent studies have extensively highlighted the strong associations between psoriasis and various inflammatory markers, which are considered novel predictive tools for evaluating systemic inflammation. Methods: Cross-sectional data from the NHANES were analyzed in this study. To assess model performance and generalizability, the dataset was randomly divided into 70% for training and 30% for validation. To address class imbalance in the training data, a hybrid resampling technique (SMOTEENN) was applied. Subsequently, nine classification algorithms were developed using the processed training set, including random forest, neural networks, XGBoost, k-nearest neighbors, gradient boosting, logistic regression, naïve Bayes, AdaBoost, and SVMs. The final gradient boosting was implemented via the gbm package in R, with hyperparameters selected from the default tuning grid of the caret framework. Inflammatory biomarkers with the highest classification utility were identified based on the predictions of the best-performing model. Results: A total of 22,908 participants were included in the final analysis. Gradient boosting (AUC: 0.629, 95% CI: 0.588-0.669) demonstrated the highest performance, followed closely by logistic regression (AUC: 0.627, 95% CI: 0.588-0.666). Among all the inflammatory markers, MLR exhibited the best classification performance, with an AUC value of 0.662 (95% CI: 0.640-0.683), followed by NLMR, with an AUC value of 0.661 (95% CI: 0.640-0.683). Other markers, including the NLR, dNLR, SII, SIRI, and PLR, had AUC values ranging from 0.658 to 0.661. The MLR had the highest relative importance score, demonstrating its critical role in the model's predictive performance for psoriasis classification. The NLR ranked second, followed by the SII and SIRI, which had moderate contributions, whereas the PLR contributed the least. Conclusions: Among all the tested algorithms, the gradient boosting model achieved the best performance. Not only does it achieve the highest predictive accuracy, but it also excels in classification efficacy and feature importance analysis, highlighting key inflammatory markers such as the MLR, SII, and NLR. These markers are significant as reliable indicators for evaluating systemic inflammation and predicting the development of psoriasis, emphasizing their potential clinical applications.

Indexed as

InflammationMachine LearningPsoriasisAdultAlgorithmsBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersmachine learning algorithmsmonocyte-to-lymphocyte rationational health and nutrition examination surveyneutrophil-to-monocyte ratiopsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID40821804
PMCPMC12350470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.